Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff

> Lee's point is valid....we should be doing the set_normalized_timespec.
>

Semantically that sounds correct. But the intension of the caller as in
our case could be to convert the timespec to nsec_t. Calling
set_normalized_timespec() might be an overhead in this case. 

Balbir
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [Patch 0/9] Per-task delay accounting
  - From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
- [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
  - From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
  - From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
  - From: "Balbir Singh" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
  - From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] kexec for ia64
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: Implement swap prefetching tweaks
Previous by thread: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
Next by thread: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]