Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff

> You don't think it's a problem that 2.0000001s - 1.9999999s would return
> garbage rather than 0.0000002?
>
> Lee
>

The caller can use set_normalized_timespec() to fix that.

Warm Regards,
Balbir
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
  - From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>

References:
- [Patch 0/9] Per-task delay accounting
  - From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
- [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
  - From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
  - From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers.
Next by Date: Re: xen DMA bug
Previous by thread: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
Next by thread: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]