Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



j4K3xBl4sT3r wrote:
Hello all,

I've been seeing many Linux versions, with many features, some of them
just for the newest branches (2.4.x and 2.6.x), I would like to know
for which kind of system each kernel is recommended.

Hi,

I am not a kernel developer, so this is not an official recommendation, but exactly what kind of "small" system do you mean?

I build and maintain a Linux distribution geared for memory-constrained x86 systems, as old as 386s with 4MB of RAM, and the 2.6 kernel fairs very well there. I only do so as a hobby not officially supported, so I haven't tested the distribution with a very wide range of workloads, but for bootstrapping itself from sources and for general home LAN routing work, its great.

You might want to look into patch sets like the 2.6-tiny patches, which greatly reduce the memory footprint of the kernel: http://www.selenic.com/linux-tiny/

Also, you might want to look into the uclibc or dietlibc libraries, which are a much smaller and less memory hungry than glibc (which has become a memory pig in recent years).

Regards,
LL

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux