Hi Bernard. On Sunday 05 February 2006 06:53, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: > > After the first suspend, do you have any processes sucking all > > available cpu? This sounds like a thread that has been added since > > 2.6.15, which is being told to enter the freezer, but isn't doing > > it. They usually end up sucking cpu afterwards. > > A good thought. I just tried it again. The system woke up from the > first S3 sleep with nothing chewing CPU. Just as a check, the second > S3 sleep still hangs with the repeating exregion-* messages. > > I also tried vanilla 2.6.16-rc2 (which includes the latest ACPICA > releases in it), and it has the same problem. I think this is your department :) Nigel
Attachment:
pgpytnDPIcQkR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: S3 sleep regression / 2.6.16-rc1+acpi-release-20060113
- From: Sanjoy Mahajan <[email protected]>
- Re: S3 sleep regression / 2.6.16-rc1+acpi-release-20060113
- Prev by Date: RE: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers.
- Next by Date: Re: S3 sleep regression / 2.6.16-rc1+acpi-release-20060113
- Previous by thread: Re: S3 sleep regression / 2.6.16-rc1+acpi-release-20060113
- Next by thread: Re: S3 sleep regression / 2.6.16-rc1+acpi-release-20060113
- Index(es):
 |