Re: [PATCH 00/03] Unmapped: Separate unmapped and mapped pages

On 3/11/06, Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Magnus Damm wrote:
>
> > Unmapped patches - Use two LRU:s per zone.
>
> Note that if this is done then the default case of zone_reclaim becomes
> trivial to deal with and we can get rid of the zone_reclaim_interval.

That's a good thing, right? =)

> However, I have not looked at the rest yet.

Please do. I'd like to hear what you think about it.

Thanks,

/ magnus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/03] Unmapped: Separate unmapped and mapped pages
    • From: Magnus Damm <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/03] Unmapped: Separate unmapped and mapped pages
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/03] Unmapped: Separate unmapped and mapped pages
• Next by Date: Re: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/03] Unmapped: Separate unmapped and mapped pages
• Next by thread: bonjour
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]