Luben Tuikov wrote:
> Me, early Jan'06: Paper submitted.
> Linuxsymposium, 16 Feb 2006 : Paper approved.
> Linuxsymposium, date unknown: Silently moved to a BOF, I was never notified.
> Me, 9 Mar 2006 : BOF rejected by me because last year I did held a SAS BOF.
> Linuxsymposium, 9 Mar 2006 : moved back to a paper.
> Linuxsymposium, 9 Mar 2006 : paper rejected.
>
> Serial Attached SCSI, An Architecture For Linux
On the face of it, the Ottawa Linux Symposium has some
explaining to do. This following quote is from:
http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2006/cfp.php
"Step 2 Committee Review"
"The programme committee will review your proposal per
the guidelines above. Notification of acceptance or
rejection will be sent by February 15th, 2006."
Luben, it looks like you failed at Step 2.5 (hidden):
political correctness. Perhaps OLS approved another
paper from a different author on a similar subject?
For reference here is the OLS review committee who, it
would seem, "approved" Luben's paper:
Jeff Garzik, Red Hat Software
Gerrit Huizenga, IBM
Andrew Hutton, Steamballoon Incorporated
Dave Jones, Red Hat Software
Ben LaHaise, Intel Corporation
Matt Mackall, Selenic Consulting
Patrick Mochel, Intel Corporation
Craig Ross, Linux Symposium
Doug Gilbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
