On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 23:41 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Pá 10-03-06 07:34:36, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Friday 10 March 2006 00:55, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > > > Except that suspend2 is not going to be merged, for variety of
> > > > reasons. One of them is that noone is working on merging it...
> > >
> > > one of them being the operative word, afaik, nigel was unwilling to work
> > > on the issues needed for merging for the reason that it wouldnt be
> > > merged..
> >
> > Yes. The only reason I'm not going to commit myself to getting carried away
> > with seeking to merge it is that you've clearly stated that you don't want to
> > see it merged, and you haven't been overruled by other kernel
> > maintainers
>
> Unless I'm missing something, Kasper is not the one who stated
> anything about merging suspend2...
i do wish suspend2 to get merged, however, if there are issues so that
its a risk, i can understand it wont being merged just now, but as nigel
just said, he is willing to work on it, if it then will be merged, which
puts the ball in your hand.
i hope for this to happen :)
> Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
