Sam Vilain <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >For block device's inode, we don't write a inode's meta data
> >itself. But, I think we should write inode's meta data for fsync().
> >
> >
>
> Ouch... won't that halve performance of database transaction logs?
Yes, it could well cause a lot more seeking to do atime and/or mtime
writes. Which aren't terribly important, really.
Unless I'm missing something, I suspect we'd be better off without this,
even though it's a correctness fix :(
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
