On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 11:00:07AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Sam> Eventually - yes. But not just now. Kbuild was introduced
> Sam> because it was needed in the top-level directory and it made
> Sam> good sense to do so. But for now keeping Makefile is a good
> Sam> choice. This is anyway what people are used to.
>
> OK, disregard my suggestion then. Should we patch
> Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt to correct the current
> documentation, which says:
>
> The preferred name for the kbuild files is 'Kbuild' but 'Makefile'
> will continue to be supported. All new developmen is expected to use
> the Kbuild filename.
>
Yes - I will do so. Thanks.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
