> >
> > it breaks ABI because this structure is communicated to userspace, and
> > you change both the layout and the size of it. What else would ABI
> > mean??
> >
> Many structures exported to user space in kernel are undergoing some
> change, A good application shouldn't count on invariability forever,
> My test application hasn't any problem before change and after change.
this is absolutely incorrect. This is an ABI that cannot change in any
incompatible way.
> >
> > but... what makes you think it's not a kernel thread such as kjournald?
> > (which have basically meaningless current)
> >
> you can get values of these fields without any problem for kernel
> thread although they are useless.
exactly
> >
> > there is no "full path name" concept in linux like that. And even worse,
> > many processes will not have *any* path because they have been deleted,
> > especially the viruses will use this ;)
> >
> For this case you said, this patch has now way really, do you have a
> good way to handle this case?
it sounds that what you want to achieve is broken in the first place...
(or should use audit etc)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
