Re: [PATCH] Define flush_wc, a way to flush write combining store buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 08 March 2006 22:43, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 08:38 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> > I think people already don't undersatnd the existing gazillion of
> > barriers we have with quite unclear semantics in some cases, it's not
> > time to add a new one ...
> 
> What do you suggest I do, then?  This makes a substantial difference to
> performance for us.  Should I confine this somehow to the ipath driver
> directory and have a nest of ifdefs in an include file there?

I think doing it privately is the better solution because I don't think you 
have established it has an universal semantic that works
on all X86-64 systems.

And we don't have a portable way to do WC anyways, so there is 
no portable way to use it.

So just put an ifdef in.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux