Re: Fw: Re: oops in choose_configuration()

[Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>]

In-Reply-To: <20060308005455.GA23921@kroah.com>

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 16:54:55 -0800, Greg KH wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:54:24PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > At least one susbsystem rolls its own method of adding env vars to the
> > uevent buffer, and it's so broken it triggers the WARN_ON() in
> > lib/vsprintf.c::vsnprintf() by passing a negative length to that function.
> > Start at drivers/input/input.c::input_dev_uevent() and watch the fun.
> 
> All of the INPUT_ADD_HOTPLUG_VAR() calls do use add_uevent_var(), so we
> should be safe there.  The other calls also look safe, if not a bit
> wierd...  So I don't see how we could change this to be any safer, do
> you?

input.c line 747+ was recently added and caused the error message:

[1]=>   envp[i++] = buffer + len;
[2]=>   len += snprintf(buffer + len, buffer_size - len, "MODALIAS=");
[2]=>   len += print_modalias(buffer + len, buffer_size - len, dev) + 1;

[1]=>   envp[i] = NULL;
        return 0;

[1] What is checking for enough space here?  This didn't overflow AFAICT
but it could.

[2] The snprintf() and print_modalias() calls don't check for errors and
thus don't return -ENOMEM when the buffer does fill up.  Shouldn't they
do that instead of returning a truncated env string?  Only the final
sanity test in snprintf() keeps them from overrunning the buffer.
(It was print_modalias_bits() that actually caused the overflow.)

> Are you still seeing problems now?

Wasn't me, it was Horst Schirmeier <horst@schirmeier.com>

-- 
Chuck
"Penguins don't come from next door, they come from the Antarctic!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/