On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 06:02:12PM +0100, wixor wrote:
> >
> > But if you want to play around and verify this, try modifying the USB
> > device table in the drivers/usb/misc/uss720.c file (look for the
> > structure called "uss720_table" and add a new entry with the vendor and
> > product id of your device there.)
> >
> Well, it seems the device doesn't like the driver or vice-verse. When
> added entry to the uss720_table, /proc/bus/usb/devices reports that
> the device is being handled by this driver, but when I plug the device
> in, dmesg gets full of error reports, and the device file doesn't
> appear in /dev .
Ok, then your device is not of this type and will not work, sorry. I
suggest you go purchase a uss720 based device if you wish to do this
kind of thing.
> Now, my question is: is the cable named "usb to
> parallel cable" an interface that converts classic printer to usb
> printer? Shouldn't it be rather a real usb to parallel cable?
As the manufacturer about this, we have no idea :)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
