On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 07:15:03PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > So the question is can we get good enough at review that we can live > with the few mistakes that make it through? Exactly. Combined with the fact that we do not have many reviewers (it's a thankless, grumpy job), makes it very hard to make it "good enough"... thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- Prev by Date: Re: vmlinuz-2.6.16-rc5-git8 still nogo with Intel D945 Motherboard
- Next by Date: Re: vmlinuz-2.6.16-rc5-git8 still nogo with Intel D945 Motherboard
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- Index(es):
![]() |