Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation

[ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)]

Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> writes:

> Even Solaris documents the maturity level of its interfaces, that is all
> I am trying to do here.  I'm not trying to pass judgement on the quality
> of any of these interfaces.

So if we go down this path can we make this functional Documentation?

In particular can we have per process/per interface kinds of flags that
allow access to experimental subsystems?

If the developer has to jump through an extra hoop to use an interface
we have clearly documented this is unsupported and will change in the
future.  Anything else can be easy to miss.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/