Greg KH <[email protected]> writes: > Even Solaris documents the maturity level of its interfaces, that is all > I am trying to do here. I'm not trying to pass judgement on the quality > of any of these interfaces. So if we go down this path can we make this functional Documentation? In particular can we have per process/per interface kinds of flags that allow access to experimental subsystems? If the developer has to jump through an extra hoop to use an interface we have clearly documented this is unsupported and will change in the future. Anything else can be easy to miss. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- References:
- [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Intel I/O Acceleration Technology (I/OAT)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: core EDAC support code
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
- Index(es):