Dave Hansen wrote:
>>Interesting idea. One piece that's missing is strategy for controlling
>>creation the new context (assuming the data_access() will always evaluate
>>into a context sensitive piece of data). Otherwise a user can get out
>>of the limits imposed by sysadmin (since they may have placed themselves
>>in a context which differs from admin).
>>
>>
>Yup, that is missing for now. We couldn't agree on quite which
>implementation we want for basic containers/vservers/vpses. So, for
>now, making it useful is left as an exercise to the reader. :)
>
>BTW, the current code _is_ potentially context sensitive because
>"current" provides much of the context that we will ever need.
>
>
I have an RFC quality submission ready, extracted from Herbert's work.
I'll prepare and forward it to the ML now for reference.
Sam.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
