Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] prepare sysctls for containers

* Dave Hansen ([email protected]) wrote:
> Yup, that is missing for now.  We couldn't agree on quite which
> implementation we want for basic containers/vservers/vpses.  So, for
> now, making it useful is left as an exercise to the reader. :)

;-)

> BTW, the current code _is_ potentially context sensitive because
> "current" provides much of the context that we will ever need.

Right.  More a question of sysadmin lowering limits which aren't seen
in any context but sysadmin context.  But from your comments above and
in other mail, I understand the requirements aren't fully baked yet.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH 0/6] support separate namespaces for sysv
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][PATCH 1/6] prepare sysctls for containers
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] prepare sysctls for containers
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] prepare sysctls for containers
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] x86: Fix i386 nmi_watchdog that does not trigger die_nmi
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Busy inodes after unmount, be more verbose in generic_shutdown_super
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] prepare sysctls for containers
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] prepare sysctls for containers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]