On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 06:58:11PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > I just do not want to see CONFIG_DO_NOAPIC_BY_DEFAULT someone suggested > here (heh, it is still in subject :-). Whitelist/blacklist is fine > with me. I (and Darrick) already agreed further up in this thread that it wasn't needed. I think we're actually in agreement ;) Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- References:
- [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- From: "Michael Ellerman" <michael@ellerman.id.au>
- Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- Prev by Date: fixed assignment of BARs for a "hotplug" device
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: core EDAC support code
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- Index(es):
 |