Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume

["Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>]

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:25:43 +0100 Jens Axboe wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 28 2006, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >> I'm sure Hannes will regenerate against upstream as well if necessary,
> > >> however that depends on when this should be applied.
> > > 
> > > It's far too late and too intrusive for 2.6.16-rc.
> > > 
> > > It's #upstream or <null>.
> > > 
> > Calm down. Of course I will regenerate is against #upstream.
> > In fact, I've done so initially but wasn't sure what the status of
> > libata-dev is. So I've diffed it against linux-git instead.
> > 
> > Updated patch to follow.
> 
> Thanks Hannes. I wasn't so much worried about it going directly in (I
> have no problem waiting), just that there seemed to be some disagreement
> on where suspend is at and what we can "support".

Hi Hannes,

Did you ever send the updated patch?  I need it to use with the
rest of the ata-acpi objects patchset for #upstream (actually for -mm).

Thanks,
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/