On Tue, Feb 28 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >Upstream 2.6.x certainly _does_ care about suspend/resume! To me, this
> >patch seems simple enough to be included. It's little more than
> >splitting the register init out form the port_stop/start functions and
> >calling them on resume/suspend appropriately.
>
> Upstream _libata_ doesn't care much about suspend/resume. Officially,
> its a work in progress with major pieces -- your patch and ACPI -- still
> missing.
Eh my patch is not missing, it's been merged since the start of
2.6.16-rc. The acpi patch is still missing, however that's not required
on all machines. So SATA suspend should work now, at least on ata_piix
which is the only driver that currently enables it.
For 2.6.15 I agree, we don't care about suspend since it basically
cannot work. That's not the case for 2.6.16 though.
> Further, good improvements covering some of the changes in Hannes' patch
> are already in #upstream.
>
> Thus, it's more work than its worth to care about the patch as-is. It
> should be redone against #upstream, which is where all suspend/resume
> development is occurring.
I'm sure Hannes will regenerate against upstream as well if necessary,
however that depends on when this should be applied.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]