On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:58 +1100, Peter Williams wrote:
> If you're going to manage the time slice in nanoseconds why not do it
> properly? I presume you've held back a bit in case you break something?
>
Do you mean the < NS_TICK thing? The spare change doesn't go away.
> If it helps, the smpnice balancing code's use of static_prio_timeslice()
> doesn't really care what units it's return value is in as long as
> DEF_TIMESLICE is in the same units and contains the size of a time slice
> allocated to a nice==0 non RT task.
Ok, thanks. I wanted to make very certain I couldn't screw it up.
Still, it's simpler to just leave it in ticks.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
