Greetings,
Below, please find part 1 of my latest task throttling effort. I've
very nearly completely reworked it from top to bottom, and broken it
down into separate cleanup and a throttling diffs.
Main things that this diff does:
1. Closes a generic hole in the scheduler design: due to timeslice
sample rate of HZ, tasks can and do steal time from each other.
Generally this is no big deal, because statistics more or less even
things out, but tasks with a high scheduling frequency and a low
execution duration can steal considerable time. No longer.
2. Removes overhead from the fast path. There's no need to do division
in the fast path, it's cheaper to do it at timeslice refresh time, where
it accomplishes the same thing at a fraction of the cost. Trades a
subtraction for a division, and removes the obsoleted bits that led to
the division.
I have verified that the testcase sent in by David Mosberg ages ago, and
which was the prime motivator for going to nanosecond timings in the
scheduler in the first place, is not broken by the above changes.
3. Removes the disparity in the handling of dynamic priority for kernel
threads verses user-land tasks.
4. Fixes a boot-time buglet where the TSC isn't synchronized yet,
resulting in recalc_task_prio() being called with now < p->timestamp.
If you place a WARN_ON there, the box won't even boot. With this fix,
you'll get one warning, and then all goes fine.
5. Fixes a couple of would-be bugs if anyone ever decided to use
TASK_NONINTERACTIVE thing along with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE.
6. Removes sleep_avg multiplier. Back when we had 10s of dynamic range,
this was needed to help get interactive tasks up to speed. The 10 time
speedup meant that a 1s sleep put us at max priority. Worked great. As
we speak however, we have _1_ second of dynamic range, and this gets
compressed to 100ms by the multiplier. This is very bad, and to see how
bad, just try a very modest parallel kernel compile in a relatively slow
NFS mounted filesystem. In heavy testing, I can find no detriment to
removing this anachronism.
7. Assorted cleanups to the interactivity logic.
8. Whatever I forgot to mention ;-)
Comments?
-Mike
Signed-off-by Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
include/linux/sched.h | 3 -
kernel/sched.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2/include/linux/sched.h.org 2006-03-01 15:06:22.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2/include/linux/sched.h 2006-03-02 08:33:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -720,7 +720,8 @@
unsigned long policy;
cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
- unsigned int time_slice, first_time_slice;
+ int time_slice;
+ unsigned int first_time_slice;
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
struct sched_info sched_info;
--- linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2/kernel/sched.c.org 2006-03-01 15:05:56.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2/kernel/sched.c 2006-03-02 10:05:47.000000000 +0100
@@ -99,6 +99,10 @@
#define MAX_SLEEP_AVG (DEF_TIMESLICE * MAX_BONUS)
#define STARVATION_LIMIT (MAX_SLEEP_AVG)
#define NS_MAX_SLEEP_AVG (JIFFIES_TO_NS(MAX_SLEEP_AVG))
+#define NS_MAX_SLEEP_AVG_PCNT (NS_MAX_SLEEP_AVG / 100)
+#define PCNT_PER_DYNPRIO (100 / MAX_BONUS)
+#define NS_PER_DYNPRIO (PCNT_PER_DYNPRIO * NS_MAX_SLEEP_AVG_PCNT)
+#define NS_TICK (JIFFIES_TO_NS(1))
/*
* If a task is 'interactive' then we reinsert it in the active
@@ -153,9 +157,25 @@
#define TASK_INTERACTIVE(p) \
((p)->prio <= (p)->static_prio - DELTA(p))
-#define INTERACTIVE_SLEEP(p) \
- (JIFFIES_TO_NS(MAX_SLEEP_AVG * \
- (MAX_BONUS / 2 + DELTA((p)) + 1) / MAX_BONUS - 1))
+#define SLEEP_AVG_DIVISOR(p) (1 + CURRENT_BONUS(p))
+
+#define INTERACTIVE_SLEEP_AVG(p) \
+ (min(JIFFIES_TO_NS(MAX_SLEEP_AVG * (MAX_BONUS / 2 + DELTA(p)) / \
+ MAX_BONUS), NS_MAX_SLEEP_AVG))
+
+/*
+ * Returns whether a task has been asleep long enough to be considered idle.
+ * The metric is whether this quantity of sleep would promote the task more
+ * than one priority beyond marginally interactive.
+ */
+static int task_interactive_idle(task_t *p, unsigned long sleep_time)
+{
+ unsigned long ceiling = (CURRENT_BONUS(p) + 2) * NS_PER_DYNPRIO;
+
+ if (p->sleep_avg + sleep_time < ceiling)
+ return 0;
+ return p->sleep_avg + sleep_time >= INTERACTIVE_SLEEP_AVG(p);
+}
#define TASK_PREEMPTS_CURR(p, rq) \
((p)->prio < (rq)->curr->prio)
@@ -182,7 +202,7 @@
static inline unsigned int task_timeslice(task_t *p)
{
- return static_prio_timeslice(p->static_prio);
+ return JIFFIES_TO_NS(static_prio_timeslice(p->static_prio));
}
#define task_hot(p, now, sd) ((long long) ((now) - (p)->last_ran) \
@@ -240,6 +260,7 @@
unsigned long expired_timestamp;
unsigned long long timestamp_last_tick;
+ unsigned long long timestamp_last_switch;
task_t *curr, *idle;
struct mm_struct *prev_mm;
prio_array_t *active, *expired, arrays[2];
@@ -777,6 +798,9 @@
unsigned long long __sleep_time = now - p->timestamp;
unsigned long sleep_time;
+ if (unlikely(now < p->timestamp))
+ __sleep_time = 0ULL;
+
if (unlikely(p->policy == SCHED_BATCH))
sleep_time = 0;
else {
@@ -788,32 +812,32 @@
if (likely(sleep_time > 0)) {
/*
- * User tasks that sleep a long time are categorised as
- * idle. They will only have their sleep_avg increased to a
+ * Tasks that sleep a long time are categorised as idle.
+ * They will only have their sleep_avg increased to a
* level that makes them just interactive priority to stay
* active yet prevent them suddenly becoming cpu hogs and
* starving other processes.
*/
- if (p->mm && sleep_time > INTERACTIVE_SLEEP(p)) {
- unsigned long ceiling;
-
- ceiling = JIFFIES_TO_NS(MAX_SLEEP_AVG -
- DEF_TIMESLICE);
- if (p->sleep_avg < ceiling)
- p->sleep_avg = ceiling;
- } else {
+ if (task_interactive_idle(p, sleep_time)) {
+ unsigned long ceiling = INTERACTIVE_SLEEP_AVG(p);
/*
- * The lower the sleep avg a task has the more
- * rapidly it will rise with sleep time. This enables
- * tasks to rapidly recover to a low latency priority.
- * If a task was sleeping with the noninteractive
- * label do not apply this non-linear boost
+ * Promote previously interactive task.
*/
- if (p->sleep_type != SLEEP_NONINTERACTIVE || !p->mm)
- sleep_time *=
- (MAX_BONUS - CURRENT_BONUS(p)) ? : 1;
+ if (p->sleep_avg > ceiling) {
+ ceiling = p->sleep_avg / NS_PER_DYNPRIO;
+ if (ceiling < MAX_BONUS)
+ ceiling++;
+ ceiling *= NS_PER_DYNPRIO;
+ } else {
+ ceiling += p->time_slice >> 2;
+ if (ceiling > NS_MAX_SLEEP_AVG)
+ ceiling = NS_MAX_SLEEP_AVG;
+ }
+ if (p->sleep_avg < ceiling)
+ p->sleep_avg = ceiling;
+ } else {
/*
* This code gives a bonus to interactive tasks.
*
@@ -1367,7 +1391,8 @@
out_activate:
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
- if (old_state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) {
+
+ if (old_state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) {
rq->nr_uninterruptible--;
/*
* Tasks waking from uninterruptible sleep are likely
@@ -1461,6 +1486,8 @@
*/
local_irq_disable();
p->time_slice = (current->time_slice + 1) >> 1;
+ if (unlikely(p->time_slice < NS_TICK))
+ p->time_slice = NS_TICK;
/*
* The remainder of the first timeslice might be recovered by
* the parent if the child exits early enough.
@@ -1468,13 +1495,12 @@
p->first_time_slice = 1;
current->time_slice >>= 1;
p->timestamp = sched_clock();
- if (unlikely(!current->time_slice)) {
+ if (unlikely(current->time_slice < NS_TICK)) {
/*
* This case is rare, it happens when the parent has only
* a single jiffy left from its timeslice. Taking the
* runqueue lock is not a problem.
*/
- current->time_slice = 1;
scheduler_tick();
}
local_irq_enable();
@@ -2586,6 +2612,7 @@
{
unsigned long long last = max(p->timestamp, rq->timestamp_last_tick);
p->sched_time += now - last;
+ p->time_slice -= now - last;
}
/*
@@ -2735,8 +2762,8 @@
* RR tasks need a special form of timeslice management.
* FIFO tasks have no timeslices.
*/
- if ((p->policy == SCHED_RR) && !--p->time_slice) {
- p->time_slice = task_timeslice(p);
+ if ((p->policy == SCHED_RR) && p->time_slice < NS_TICK) {
+ p->time_slice += task_timeslice(p);
p->first_time_slice = 0;
set_tsk_need_resched(p);
@@ -2745,11 +2772,21 @@
}
goto out_unlock;
}
- if (!--p->time_slice) {
+ if (p->time_slice < NS_TICK) {
+ int time_slice = task_timeslice(p);
+ int run_time = time_slice - p->time_slice;
dequeue_task(p, rq->active);
set_tsk_need_resched(p);
+ p->time_slice += time_slice;
+ /*
+ * Tasks are charged proportionately less run_time at high
+ * sleep_avg to delay them losing their interactive status
+ */
+ run_time /= SLEEP_AVG_DIVISOR(p);
+ p->sleep_avg -= run_time;
+ if ((long)p->sleep_avg < 0)
+ p->sleep_avg = 0;
p->prio = effective_prio(p);
- p->time_slice = task_timeslice(p);
p->first_time_slice = 0;
if (!rq->expired_timestamp)
@@ -2777,13 +2814,17 @@
* This only applies to tasks in the interactive
* delta range with at least TIMESLICE_GRANULARITY to requeue.
*/
- if (TASK_INTERACTIVE(p) && !((task_timeslice(p) -
- p->time_slice) % TIMESLICE_GRANULARITY(p)) &&
- (p->time_slice >= TIMESLICE_GRANULARITY(p)) &&
- (p->array == rq->active)) {
+ if (p->array == rq->active) {
+ unsigned long runtime, period;
- requeue_task(p, rq->active);
- set_tsk_need_resched(p);
+ runtime = now - rq->timestamp_last_switch;
+ period = JIFFIES_TO_NS(TIMESLICE_GRANULARITY(p));
+
+ if (runtime >= period && p->time_slice >> 1 >= period) {
+ requeue_task(p, rq->active);
+ set_tsk_need_resched(p);
+ rq->timestamp_last_switch = now;
+ }
}
}
out_unlock:
@@ -2851,7 +2892,8 @@
*/
static inline unsigned long smt_slice(task_t *p, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
- return p->time_slice * (100 - sd->per_cpu_gain) / 100;
+ int time_slice = NS_TO_JIFFIES(p->time_slice) ? : 1;
+ return time_slice * (100 - sd->per_cpu_gain) / 100;
}
static int dependent_sleeper(int this_cpu, runqueue_t *this_rq)
@@ -3014,7 +3056,6 @@
prio_array_t *array;
struct list_head *queue;
unsigned long long now;
- unsigned long run_time;
int cpu, idx, new_prio;
/*
@@ -3050,19 +3091,6 @@
schedstat_inc(rq, sched_cnt);
now = sched_clock();
- if (likely((long long)(now - prev->timestamp) < NS_MAX_SLEEP_AVG)) {
- run_time = now - prev->timestamp;
- if (unlikely((long long)(now - prev->timestamp) < 0))
- run_time = 0;
- } else
- run_time = NS_MAX_SLEEP_AVG;
-
- /*
- * Tasks charged proportionately less run_time at high sleep_avg to
- * delay them losing their interactive status
- */
- run_time /= (CURRENT_BONUS(prev) ? : 1);
-
spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
if (unlikely(prev->flags & PF_DEAD))
@@ -3075,7 +3103,7 @@
unlikely(signal_pending(prev))))
prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
else {
- if (prev->state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
+ if (prev->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
deactivate_task(prev, rq);
}
@@ -3136,7 +3164,6 @@
if (next->sleep_type == SLEEP_INTERACTIVE)
delta = delta * (ON_RUNQUEUE_WEIGHT * 128 / 100) / 128;
- array = next->array;
new_prio = recalc_task_prio(next, next->timestamp + delta);
if (unlikely(next->prio != new_prio)) {
@@ -3156,14 +3183,11 @@
update_cpu_clock(prev, rq, now);
- prev->sleep_avg -= run_time;
- if ((long)prev->sleep_avg <= 0)
- prev->sleep_avg = 0;
prev->timestamp = prev->last_ran = now;
sched_info_switch(prev, next);
if (likely(prev != next)) {
- next->timestamp = now;
+ next->timestamp = rq->timestamp_last_switch = now;
rq->nr_switches++;
rq->curr = next;
++*switch_count;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
