>>>>> On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 21:45:56 -0800 (PST), "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> said:
>> I and Ralf talked a bit about the jiffies issue. Making an union
>> containing jiffies and jiffies_64 looks good to avoid such an
>> optimization problem, but it would affect so many existing codes.
davem> Maybe use an anonymous union? That might help...
Do you mean something like this:
union {
struct {
unsigned long pad;
unsigned long jiffies;
};
u64 jiffies_64;
};
Unfortunately a toplevel anonymous union looks not allowed...
---
Atsushi Nemoto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
