Re: [PATCH] simplify update_times (avoid jiffies/jiffies_64 aliasing problem)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


>>>>> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:04:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> said:
akpm> John, that timer stuff is so fundamental and hits on code which
akpm> has historically been so fragile that I'm not sure it's even
akpm> 2.6.17 material.  In which case we should sneak patches like the
akpm> above underneath it all.

akpm> Or we decide to take your work into 2.6.17, in which case the
akpm> above needs to be redone for that context.

I think most important part is update_times() cleanup (to avoid
jiffies/wall_jiffies mismatch) and it (and x86_64 part) seems not
conflict with john's work for now.

akpm> I'm not sure how to resolve this, really.  Worried.  Have you
akpm> socialised those changes with architecture maintainers?  If so,
akpm> what was the feedback?

I and Ralf talked a bit about the jiffies issue.  Making an union
containing jiffies and jiffies_64 looks good to avoid such an
optimization problem, but it would affect so many existing codes.

Atsushi Nemoto
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux