On Thu, 2006-03-02 22:46:02 +0100, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:40:17PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > On 3/2/06, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > > > We do not have to export symbols we don't want to export to modules but > > > needed by CONFIG_UNIX. > > I'm probably exposing my ignorance here, but, what symbols would those be? > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/18/44 That names *one* symbol. *plonk*, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386 double fault enhancements
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- Index(es):
![]() |