On Thu, 2006-03-02 18:38:40 +0100, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 12:31:34PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > > Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It does also matter in the kernel image size case, since you have to put > > > enough modules to the other medium for having a effect bigger than the > > > kernel image size increase from setting CONFIG_MODULES=y. > > That's not very difficult considering the large number of modules that's > > out there that a system may wish to use. > This might be true for full-blown desktop systems - but these do not > tend to be the systems where kernel image size matters that much. > Smaller kernel image size might be an issue e.g. for distribution > kernels, but in a much less pressing way. Kernel image size matters if you try to make it boot off a floppy. MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- References:
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- Prev by Date: Re: x86_64 compile spewing hundreds of warnings - started 2.6.15-git8
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take4)
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- Index(es):