Re: [PATCH] Proc: move proc fs hooks from cpuset.c to proc/fs/base.c

> Agreed.  However the direction I am gradually moving fs/proc/base.c
> is the opposite.

Oh - ok fine.

I had seen something from Andrew a couple of days ago
that led me to a different understanding in this particular
case.

Andrew - kill this patch (unless you know better.)

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Proc: move proc fs hooks from cpuset.c to proc/fs/base.c
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• References:
  • [PATCH] Proc: move proc fs hooks from cpuset.c to proc/fs/base.c
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Proc: move proc fs hooks from cpuset.c to proc/fs/base.c
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Proc: move proc fs hooks from cpuset.c to proc/fs/base.c
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Proc: move proc fs hooks from cpuset.c to proc/fs/base.c
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• Prev by Date: RAID5 initial rebuild slow, 2.6.16-rc4
• Next by Date: Question: how to map SCSI data DMA address to virtual address?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Proc: move proc fs hooks from cpuset.c to proc/fs/base.c
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Proc: move proc fs hooks from cpuset.c to proc/fs/base.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]