Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)

Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

The controller in the bugzilla entry ie a SiI 3114.
It was a quick fix and I did expect more thorough investigation later
(probably 2.6.17 frame). Though it seems FUA-related problems are so
numerous FUA itself will be blacklisted for 2.6.16, so the limited
blacklist is no longer needed.


Well, we're looking for a long term solution :)

Disabling FUA by default in 2.6.16 is a temporary solution.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
  - From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
  - From: "Eric D. Mudama" <[email protected]>
- FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
  - From: "Nicolas Mailhot" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Proc: move proc fs hooks from cpuset.c to proc/fs/base.c
Next by Date: [PATCH] proc: Use sane permission checks on the /proc/<pid>/fd/ symlinks.
Previous by thread: Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
Next by thread: 2.6.16-rc3: another issue: x86_64 with ATI chipsets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]