On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 12:49:53AM -0500, Brown, Len wrote:
> >
> > I'm afraid that even after we get this stuff out of /proc
> > and into sysfs where it belongs, we'll have to leave /proc/acpi around
> > for a while b/c unfortunately people are under the impression
> > that the path names there actually mean something and
> > they can actually count on them -- which they can't.
>
> Is it possible to obtain the same control/information with sysfs that is
> available from /proc/acpi? For example, I use quite extensively CPU
> throttling on my VAIO ("cool & quiet home-made mode"), and I was unable to
> find the equivalent of /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling ...
I can't help thinking that that should be going through cpufreq.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
