Paul Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It'd be interesting to see if just the data structure expansion: > > Nice guess. > > It still crashes on boot. > OK. This is awful. I cannot see it. If someone passes get_cpu_sysdev() a -ve cpu number then ugly things will happen, but it's unlikely to be that. Pretty sad coding though. > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference (address 0000000000000058) > ... > ip is at sysfs_create_group+0x30/0x2a0 Are you able to determine which pointer deref this is faulting at? I couldn't find any fields which look like they're 0x58 bytes into anything. Thanks for persisting with this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- Prev by Date: Re: [stable] Re: [patch 38/39] Normal user can panic NFS client with direct I/O (CVE-2006-0555)
- Next by Date: Re: Kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2564 - 2.6.16-rc5-g7b14e3b5
- Previous by thread: Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- Next by thread: Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- Index(es):
 |