Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree

[Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>]

Greg wrote:
> As reported this is expected, and can be ignored safely.  It's just scsi
> being bad :)

Yeah - so I eventually realized.

> >  [<a0000001001eac90>] sysfs_create_group+0x30/0x2a0
> >                                 sp=e00002343bd97d50 bsp=e00002343bd91120
> >  [<a000000100809190>] topology_cpu_callback+0x70/0xc0
> >                                 sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910f0
> >  [<a000000100809260>] topology_sysfs_init+0x80/0x120
> >                                 sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910d0
> 
> This points at the sysfs cpu patches that are in -mm, which are not in
> my tree...

So ... what does that mean for who should be looking at this?

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/