Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> > Oh, and Paul, this all works just fine with no -mm, right?
> 
> Do you mean - does 2.6.16-rc5 work for me?
> 
> I haven't tried that yet. The lowest I went in Andrew's 2.6.16-rc5-rc1
> patch stack was one patch, which would be 2.6.16-rc5 plus
> "linus.patch."

That's tip-of-linus-tree a day or so after -rc5.

> I will try a plain 2.6.16-rc5 as well, shortly.

I don't think there's much point in that - the sysfs-topology code went in
on Feb 15.

If 2.6.16-rc5+linus.patch works and
2.6.16-rc5+linus.patch+gregkh-driver-allow-sysfs-attribute-files-to-be-pollable.patch
crashes then we have a pretty good idea of where to look.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/