David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> wrote: > > > > > > Uhm, the version of GNU make in Debian (3.81beta4) was released > > > > 12 December 2005; I wouldn't call that dead (or unmaintained). > > > > > > Oh, and as an update, 3.81rc1 was release on the 19th of February 2006. > > > > > > Yeah, very unmaintained and dead upstream... > > > > None of the bugs I did report has been fixed. > > Well, the bug you complain most about is about spewing of some > warnings for something completely harmless. I know of another > certain set of software that spews unnecessary and annoying > warnings. Those haven't been removed for despite complaints for > several years either. Does this mean that cdrecord is an unmaintained > piece of software that's dead upstream? If you do not understand the diffeence between a useful warning (as with cdrecord) and a warning that is a result of a severe bug caused by incorrect make file handling (as in GNU make) you are obviously wrong here. Jörg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- References:
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- From: Tim Walberg <twalberg@mindspring.com>
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- From: Tim Walberg <twalberg@mindspring.com>
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- From: Tim Walberg <twalberg@mindspring.com>
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- From: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- From: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- From: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>
- Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- Prev by Date: Re: jiffies_64 vs. jiffies
- Next by Date: Re: why VM_SHM has been removed from mm.h?
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
- Index(es):
![]() |