On 2/28/06, Christian <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 20:59 schrieb Jesper Juhl:
[snip]
> >
> > Do we have a scheduler problem?
> > An io-scheduler problem?
>
> I'm not really into this, but what happens if you simply start 5 different
> kernel-builds in parallel? I think if it makes a difference then this would
> mean that there's something wrong with make and you could eliminate the first
> two possibilities?!
>
Well, no need for 5 kernel builds in that case.
If I clone my source tree and then simply run
$ make distclean ; make allnoconfig ; nice make
in each directory in two different shells at the same time, then both
cores get fully loaded.
> > Is it "make" that's being difficult?
> > Is it something in the kernels Makefile that causes the build to
> > behave this way?
> > Could it be a bottleneck in my system somewhere?
> >
> > Anyone got a clue?
> >
--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
