Re: GFS2 Filesystem [13/16]

[Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 14:30 -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 06:50:59PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > --- a/fs/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> > > @@ -883,8 +884,6 @@ config CONFIGFS_FS
> > >  	  Both sysfs and configfs can and should exist together on the
> > >  	  same system. One is not a replacement for the other.
> > >  
> > > -	  If unsure, say N.
> > > -
> > 
> > Why? Most users probably still want configfs_fs=N.
> 
> 	What version is this patch against?  This line was removed from
> mainline a while ago.
> 	As to why it was removed, the discussion happened back then.
> Basically, if something requires CONFIGFS_FS (eg, OCFS2) and is a
> module, then a user is asked whether they want configfs as a module or
> built-in.  Text saying "say N" is completely incorrect there.
> 
> Joel
> 
Checking the gfs2 git tree and Linus' tree again reveals that its not
something that we changed. I think I must have fed the wrong command to
git to produce the diff as the change is quite clearly there, exactly
same in both trees,

Steve.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/