On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 06:50:59PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > --- a/fs/Kconfig
> > +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> > @@ -883,8 +884,6 @@ config CONFIGFS_FS
> > Both sysfs and configfs can and should exist together on the
> > same system. One is not a replacement for the other.
> >
> > - If unsure, say N.
> > -
>
> Why? Most users probably still want configfs_fs=N.
What version is this patch against? This line was removed from
mainline a while ago.
As to why it was removed, the discussion happened back then.
Basically, if something requires CONFIGFS_FS (eg, OCFS2) and is a
module, then a user is asked whether they want configfs as a module or
built-in. Text saying "say N" is completely incorrect there.
Joel
--
"If the human brain were so simple we could understand it, we would
be so simple that we could not."
- W. A. Clouston
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (650) 506-8127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
