On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 06:17:47PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 02:14:14AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > If we make it
> >
> > if (!info) {
> > WARN_ON(1);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > will that allow people's kernels to limp along until it gets fixed?
>
> "until" - I think you mean "if anyone ever bothers" so no I don't agree.
> The bluetooth folk seem to have absolutely no interest in bug fixing.
> Can we mark bluetooth broken please?
Sorry, I mean just mark BT_HCIUART broken, not the whole of bluetooth.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
