On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 02:14:14AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Calling serial functions to flush buffers, or try to send more data
> > after the port has been closed or hung up is a bug in the code doing
> > the calling, not in the serial_core driver.
> >
> > Make this explicitly obvious by adding BUG_ON()'s.
>
> If we make it
>
> if (!info) {
> WARN_ON(1);
> return;
> }
>
> will that allow people's kernels to limp along until it gets fixed?
"until" - I think you mean "if anyone ever bothers" so no I don't agree.
The bluetooth folk seem to have absolutely no interest in bug fixing.
Can we mark bluetooth broken please?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]