On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:18:18PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Ben, earlier you expressed concern about the extra overhead due to
> > cache-line contention (on SMP) in the down_read() call added to
> > blocking_notifier_call_chain. I don't remember which notifier chain in
> > particular you were worried about; something to do with networking.
> >
> > Does this still bother you? I can see a couple of ways around it.
>
> Yes it's a problem. Any read lock is going to act as a memory barrier,
> and we need fewer of those in hot paths, not more to slow things down.
What do you think of the two suggestions in my previous message?
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
