Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote: > > @@ -538,7 +579,7 @@ void inotify_dentry_parent_queue_event(s > struct dentry *parent; > struct inode *inode; > > - if (!atomic_read (&inotify_watches)) > + if (!(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_INOTIFY_PARENT_WATCHED)) Yeah, I think that would work. One would need to wire up d_move() also - for when a file is moved from a watched to non-watched directory and vice-versa. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: udevd is killing file write performance.
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: udevd is killing file write performance.
- References:
- udevd is killing file write performance.
- From: Robin Holt <[email protected]>
- Re: udevd is killing file write performance.
- From: John McCutchan <[email protected]>
- Re: udevd is killing file write performance.
- From: Robin Holt <[email protected]>
- Re: udevd is killing file write performance.
- From: John McCutchan <[email protected]>
- Re: udevd is killing file write performance.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: udevd is killing file write performance.
- From: John McCutchan <[email protected]>
- Re: udevd is killing file write performance.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: udevd is killing file write performance.
- From: John McCutchan <[email protected]>
- Re: udevd is killing file write performance.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: udevd is killing file write performance.
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- udevd is killing file write performance.
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rt17
- Next by Date: Re: i386 AT keyboard LED question.
- Previous by thread: Re: udevd is killing file write performance.
- Next by thread: Re: udevd is killing file write performance.
- Index(es):
 |