> They are very reluctant to upgrade kernels today, for released versions > of the distro, and so they backport kernel fixes and security updates to > that older kernel, just like all of the packages in a distro. That's > they way they work. fedora actually regularly updates to newer kernels, as service to their users. (And since kernels still fix more bugs than they create it's a net win ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Gabor Gombas <gombasg@sztaki.hu>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Martin Bligh <mbligh@mbligh.org>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Prev by Date: Re: Patch to reorder functions in the vmlinux to a defined order
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] x86_64: warn if unable to configure apic main timer
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Index(es):
![]() |