agp fixes in suspend2 patch

Matthias Hensler <[email protected]> writes:

> > > Third try sound was gone. On the fourth try the system hanged
> > > after starting ppracer (to test GLX/DRI on my i855).
> > 
> > Submit AGP fixes, then.
> 
> I think no such fixes are in Suspend 2, but still it works there.

actually there're (well i didn't compile nor test suspend2) in
100-suspend2-2.2-for-2.6.15.1.patch:

it introduces agp_suspend.h and uses it in the various agp backend
drivers in order to suspend/resume agp controllers (only for ati and
nvidia though).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: agp fixes in suspend2 patch
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Register atomic_notifiers in atomic context
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
• Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
• Next by thread: Re: agp fixes in suspend2 patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]