Re: suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On 2/21/06, Lee Revell <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 18:05 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
Pavel, if you mean that the userspace code will not be reviewed to
standards the kernel code is, kill uswsusp _NOW_ before it does too
much damage.  Unreliable suspend eats filesystems for breakfast.  The
other userspace components of the kernels services are either optional
(udev) or not that important (alsa).

Why is sound less important than suspending, or networking, or any other
subsystem?  This is an insult to everyone who worked long and hard to
get decent sound support on Linux.


I bet this was not meant as an insult. Quote: "Unreliable suspend eats
filesystems for breakfast". The worst thing mismatched ALSA library
could cause is noice in my speakers.

If you've got a Linux powered stereo in your car, you're going like the clappers and your speakers suddenly blast out white noise as loud as they possibly can, you will wish you had enough seconds left to run a measly fsck.

--
Tristan Wibberley

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux