Re: suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]

["Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>]

On 2/21/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 18:05 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > Pavel, if you mean that the userspace code will not be reviewed to
> > standards the kernel code is, kill uswsusp _NOW_ before it does too
> > much damage.  Unreliable suspend eats filesystems for breakfast.  The
> > other userspace components of the kernels services are either optional
> > (udev) or not that important (alsa).
> >
>
> Why is sound less important than suspending, or networking, or any other
> subsystem?  This is an insult to everyone who worked long and hard to
> get decent sound support on Linux.
>

I bet this was not meant as an insult. Quote: "Unreliable suspend eats
filesystems for breakfast". The worst thing mismatched ALSA library
could cause is noice in my speakers.

--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/