Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface

[Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>]

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Pavel Machek wrote:

> On Po 20-02-06 17:09:26, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 09:58:27AM -0800, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> >
> > > > Would you mind commmenting on why, as well as your opinion on the validity
> > > > of the patches themselves?
> > > >
> > > > This static, hardcoded policy was introduced into the core ~2 weeks ago,
> > > > and it doesn't seem like it belongs there at all.
> > >
> > > That patch was accepted as it fixed a oops.  It also went in for
> > > 2.6.16-rc2, which is much earlier than 2.6.16-rc4, and it had been in
> > > the -mm tree for quite a while for people to test it out and verify that
> > > it didn't break anything.  I didn't hear any complaints about it, so
> > > that is why it went in.
> > >
> > > In contrast, this patch series creates a new api and doesn't necessarily
> > > fix any reported bugs.  It also has not had the time to be tested in the
> > > -mm tree, and there is quite a lot of disagreement about the patches on
> > > the lists.  All of that combinded makes it not acceptable for so late in
> > > the -rc cycle (remember, -rc4 means only serious bug fixes.)
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > However, there are a couple of things to note:
> >
> > - These patches don't create a new API; they fix the semantics of an
> >   existing API by restoring them to its originally designed semantics.
>
> They may reintroduce "original" semantics, but they'll break
> applications needing 2.6.15 semantic (where 2 meant D3hot).

Like what?

> > - The BUG() still exists and is relatively easily triggerable (by calling
> >   pci_choose_state() with the wrong value). The fact that the BUG() was
> >   allowed into the kernel is surprising - the mantra for a long time has
> >   been that no new BUG()s should be added. This one is easily made nicer
> >   (see patch 4/4 in the next series), so I don't see why it wasn't
> >   targeted before..
>
> I don't know what you are talking about here. "No new BUGs"?! It is
> bad to have bug triggerable from userspace, but that was fixed.

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.devel/5411/match=no+new+bug

Thanks,


	Pat

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/