> Hi. > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 03:42:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Well, yep, it really depends on CPU/harddisk. > > That is why a solution using LZF is needed, so either Suspend 2 or > uswsusp. > > > Can you try code from suspend.sf.net? It should be as fast as > > suspend2. > > I would like to have a look at it, but http://suspend.sourceforge.net/ > gives me an empty directory and http://sourceforge.net/suspend/ a "page > not found". Ahha, sorry, go to www.sf.net/projects/suspend/ , then check out code from CVS, there's nice description how to do that there. Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler?
- From: Harald Arnesen <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler?
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler?
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] VPIDs: pid/vpid conversions
- Next by Date: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy.c: fix 'if ();' typo
- Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler?
- Next by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Index(es):