Re: SMP BUG — Linux Kernel

Linus Torvalds wrote:

So I like Rik's patch, but I don't feel _too_ strongly about it. Thepeople who actually work on the scheduler should be the ones to sign off(or not) on it.


I thought it looked fine. As you say, the scheduler can't work (and
will blow up) if init_idle() isn't called before it is used.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com-

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- SMP BUG
  - From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
- Re: SMP BUG
  - From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: SMP BUG
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: SMP BUG
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: SMP BUG
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current tick length
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current tick length
Previous by thread: Re: SMP BUG
Next by thread: Re: SMP BUG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]