Andrew Morton writes:
> Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Is that enough to be worth factoring out? Note that
> > update_wall_time_one_tick() needs both time_adjust_step and
> > delta_nsec, so to share more, we would have to have a function
> > returning two values and it would start to get ugly.
> >
>
> update_wall_time_one_tick() gets:
>
> long delta_nsec = new_function();
>
> and your new function becomes
>
> return (u64)new_function() << (SHIFT_SCALE - 10)) + time_adj;
and update_wall_time_one_tick misses out on this bit:
/* Reduce by this step the amount of time left */
time_adjust -= time_adjust_step;
That's why I said that update_wall_time_one_tick needs both
time_adjust_step and delta_nsec. If you have a nice way to return
both values, please let me know...
Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]