Al Viro <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 02:20:17AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> And it is actually wrong. It fails to take into account the static
>> /proc entries.
>> > + stat->nlink = proc_root.nlink + nr_processes();
>
> The hell it does. See ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this.
Right. Sorry. I had a similar issue and when I check your patch for the
same problem somehow I thought proc_root was a struct inode and not a
struct proc_dir_entry.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
