Re: [PATCH 8/8] fix handling of st_nlink on procfs root

On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 02:20:17AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> And it is actually wrong.  It fails to take into account the static
> /proc entries.
> > +	stat->nlink = proc_root.nlink + nr_processes();

The hell it does. See ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 8/8] fix handling of st_nlink on procfs root
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

References:
- [PATCH 8/8] fix handling of st_nlink on procfs root
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 8/8] fix handling of st_nlink on procfs root
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

Prev by Date: Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes 2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64
Next by Date: Fwd:
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 8/8] fix handling of st_nlink on procfs root
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 8/8] fix handling of st_nlink on procfs root
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]